ESG investing incorporates environmental, social, and governance factors into the investment process.
While the concept is now widely adopted all over the globe, the ESG investing strategies vary significantly.
If you are looking to invest as an expat or high-net-worth individual, which is what I specialize in, you can email me ([email protected]) or WhatsApp (+44-7393-450-837).
This includes if you are looking for a second opinion or alternative investments.
Some of the facts might change from the time of writing, and nothing written here is financial, legal, tax or any kind of individual advice, nor a solicitation to invest.
Investors cannot assume that all ESG funds are alike. Some exclude harmful industries, others prioritize best-performing companies, and some focus on measurable social or environmental outcomes.
For investors, especially those managing international or multi-currency portfolios, understanding ESG strategies is essential for aligning financial goals with sustainability priorities.
ESG investing strategies are used to integrate non-financial risk factors into portfolio construction and capital allocation. Their objectives are to:
ESG investing strategies serve both financial and non-financial purposes. For some investors, the focus is on minimizing downside exposure to ESG-related risks. For others, it’s about directing capital to entities that contribute to positive societal or environmental outcomes.
These strategies determine how ESG data is used—whether to screen out companies, identify leaders, engage with firms, or target specific themes—and directly impact fund composition and expected outcomes.
ESG investing is not a singular approach. Asset managers and individual investors apply ESG principles in different ways depending on their goals, regulatory environment, and risk tolerance.
Negative screening excludes companies or industries that do not meet certain ethical, environmental, or social standards.
This is one of the oldest and most widely used ESG strategies, especially among retail investors and institutional funds with explicit mandates.
Common exclusions include:
Positive screening involves selecting companies that perform better on ESG metrics relative to peers in the same industry.
Rather than eliminating entire sectors, this strategy aims to retain sector exposure while favoring sustainability leaders.
Typical criteria include:
This strategy incorporates ESG factors directly into financial analysis and valuation models without necessarily excluding or favoring specific companies.
ESG data is treated as material to investment performance, similar to traditional factors like cash flow or debt ratios.
How it works:
Thematic investing targets specific ESG themes believed to offer long-term structural growth. It channels capital into sectors or technologies aligned with global sustainability trends.
Common ESG themes:
Impact investing aims to generate quantifiable positive social or environmental outcomes alongside financial returns.
Unlike ESG integration, which may prioritize risk management, impact investing requires intentionality and measurement.
Examples:
This strategy involves using ownership rights to influence corporate behavior. Investors engage with company management through dialogue, proxy voting, and shareholder resolutions to improve ESG performance.
Typical engagement goals:
These strategies are not mutually exclusive. Many ESG funds combine multiple approaches. For example, integrating ESG scores into a best-in-class selection framework while also engaging in proxy voting.
For investors, understanding which strategy a fund employs is essential to assessing its alignment with both ethical priorities and investment goals.
Not all ESG funds are created equal. Labels such as “sustainable,” “green,” or “responsible” can mask wide differences in methodology, holdings, and actual impact.
To make informed decisions, investors must go beyond marketing material and evaluate ESG funds based on their stated strategy, structure, and transparency.
Begin by identifying what ESG strategy the fund actually follows. Is it focused on:
Check the fund’s prospectus or factsheet for clarity on its ESG objectives, targeted sectors or exclusions, and alignment with a specific sustainability theme.
If the strategy is unclear or overly broad (e.g., “we consider ESG factors where applicable”), it may be a sign of weak integration or tokenism.
Most ESG funds receive ratings from independent providers such as:
These agencies score companies and funds based on ESG-related risks and disclosures. However, methodologies vary widely. One provider may rate a company “high risk,” while another considers it “average”.
Personal financial planners may also have their own metrics that they can recommend to clients.
Scores are also relative to industry peers, not absolute ESG performance. Many ratings emphasize policy disclosure over real-world outcomes.
Use ESG scores as a starting point, not a final verdict. Ideally, the fund manager should disclose which ratings system they follow and how ESG scores influence portfolio construction.
Review the fund’s top holdings to ensure they align with its stated ESG mandate. For example:
Also examine:
If the fund’s holdings don’t match its stated values, it may be engaging in greenwashing—marketing ESG without meaningful differentiation.
ESG funds often carry higher fees due to the cost of research, screening, and active management. Compare the fund’s:
Assess whether the fund’s returns are:
Passive ESG ETFs may offer lower-cost exposure, while actively managed funds may justify higher fees with more refined analysis and shareholder engagement.
High-quality ESG funds provide regular, detailed reporting that goes beyond performance charts. Look for:
If a fund makes bold ESG claims but does not publish supporting documentation or engage in shareholder activity, its credibility should be questioned.
Evaluate the fund’s risk profile in the context of your broader portfolio:
Also consider macro risks. For example, a global ESG fund may be exposed to emerging markets with less consistent ESG reporting or weaker regulatory enforcement.
Evaluating ESG funds requires a mix of qualitative review (mandates, transparency, philosophy) and quantitative analysis (holdings, fees, performance).
Investors should not assume that an ESG label guarantees alignment with their values or financial objectives.
Instead, careful fund selection should focus on strategy consistency, operational transparency, and evidence of active stewardship.
Pained by financial indecision?
Become my client
Take client eligibility quiz
Contact
Adam is an internationally recognised author on financial matters with over 830million answer views on Quora, a widely sold book on Amazon, and a contributor on Forbes.
While the concept is now widely adopted all over the globe, the ESG investing strategies vary significantly.
If you are looking to invest as an expat or high-net-worth individual, which is what I specialize in, you can email me ([email protected]) or WhatsApp (+44-7393-450-837).
This includes if you are looking for a second opinion or alternative investments.
Some of the facts might change from the time of writing, and nothing written here is financial, legal, tax or any kind of individual advice, nor a solicitation to invest.
Investors cannot assume that all ESG funds are alike. Some exclude harmful industries, others prioritize best-performing companies, and some focus on measurable social or environmental outcomes.
For investors, especially those managing international or multi-currency portfolios, understanding ESG strategies is essential for aligning financial goals with sustainability priorities.
The Purpose of ESG Investing Strategies
ESG investing strategies are used to integrate non-financial risk factors into portfolio construction and capital allocation. Their objectives are to:
- Mitigate risk by identifying companies vulnerable to regulatory, reputational, or operational failures.
- Enhance long-term performance through exposure to companies with sustainable practices and efficient governance.
- Align investments with values related to climate change, labor rights, or corporate ethics.
- Influence corporate behavior through selective investment or shareholder engagement.
ESG investing strategies serve both financial and non-financial purposes. For some investors, the focus is on minimizing downside exposure to ESG-related risks. For others, it’s about directing capital to entities that contribute to positive societal or environmental outcomes.
These strategies determine how ESG data is used—whether to screen out companies, identify leaders, engage with firms, or target specific themes—and directly impact fund composition and expected outcomes.
Types of ESG Investment Strategies
ESG investing is not a singular approach. Asset managers and individual investors apply ESG principles in different ways depending on their goals, regulatory environment, and risk tolerance.
What is Negative Screening?
Negative screening excludes companies or industries that do not meet certain ethical, environmental, or social standards.
This is one of the oldest and most widely used ESG strategies, especially among retail investors and institutional funds with explicit mandates.
Common exclusions include:
- Fossil fuels
- Weapons and defense
- Tobacco
- Gambling
- Adult entertainment
- Human rights violations
Strengths:
- Straightforward to implement
- Clear alignment with ethical boundaries
- Popular with values-based or religious investors
Limitations:
- Does not reward companies improving ESG practices
- Can reduce sector diversification
- May overlook companies with strong financial and ESG potential despite industry classification
What is Positive Screening?
Positive screening involves selecting companies that perform better on ESG metrics relative to peers in the same industry.
Rather than eliminating entire sectors, this strategy aims to retain sector exposure while favoring sustainability leaders.
Typical criteria include:
- Low carbon intensity within the energy sector
- High board diversity relative to industry average
- Strong workplace practices or supply chain transparency
Strengths:
- Maintains sector diversification
- Encourages competition among companies for ESG leadership
- Balances financial and sustainability performance
Limitations:
- Relies heavily on third-party ESG ratings, which may be inconsistent
- May still include companies with absolute ESG risks, depending on the peer group
What is ESG Integration?
This strategy incorporates ESG factors directly into financial analysis and valuation models without necessarily excluding or favoring specific companies.
ESG data is treated as material to investment performance, similar to traditional factors like cash flow or debt ratios.
How it works:
- Analysts evaluate how environmental risks, social policies, or governance structures may affect a company’s future earnings or risk profile.
- Fund managers adjust exposure or position sizing based on ESG-adjusted risk assessments.
Strengths:
- Does not impose rigid exclusions; maintains flexibility
- Focuses on risk-adjusted returns
- Widely used by institutional investors and large asset managers
Limitations:
- Lacks transparency; ESG impact may not be visible in fund holdings
- Requires strong internal ESG research capabilities
- Can vary significantly between managers
Thematic ESG Investing
Thematic investing targets specific ESG themes believed to offer long-term structural growth. It channels capital into sectors or technologies aligned with global sustainability trends.
Common ESG themes:
- Clean and renewable energy
- Gender diversity and women in leadership
- Sustainable agriculture and food systems
- Water infrastructure and sanitation
- Circular economy and waste reduction
- Electric vehicles and battery storage
Strengths:
- High alignment with investor values and global policy goals
- Captures exposure to emerging industries
- Useful for portfolio diversification through sectoral focus
Limitations:
- Sector concentration risk
- Higher volatility, particularly in early stage industries
- Returns may be tied to policy support or subsidies
What is Impact Investing?
Impact investing aims to generate quantifiable positive social or environmental outcomes alongside financial returns.
Unlike ESG integration, which may prioritize risk management, impact investing requires intentionality and measurement.
Examples:
- Investments in microfinance institutions improving access to credit
- Private equity in renewable energy projects
- Green infrastructure in underserved communities
Measurement tools:
- Social Return on Investment (SROI)
- Carbon emissions avoided
- Number of lives improved or educated
Strengths:
- Direct connection between capital and real-world outcomes
- Appeals to mission-driven investors and foundations
- Often uncorrelated with traditional markets
Limitations:
- Often limited to private markets and illiquid assets
- Requires rigorous impact verification and monitoring
- May involve higher risk or longer time horizons
Shareholder Engagement and Stewardship
This strategy involves using ownership rights to influence corporate behavior. Investors engage with company management through dialogue, proxy voting, and shareholder resolutions to improve ESG performance.
Typical engagement goals:
- Better climate disclosures (e.g., TCFD alignment)
- More diverse board composition
- Elimination of dual-class share structures
- Improved labor policies and supply chain ethics
Strengths:
- Encourages systemic change from within
- Maintains exposure to financially sound companies
- Can be part of long-term active ownership strategies
Limitations:
- Difficult to measure short-term results
- Relies on fund managers to follow through on engagement
- Not always effective with resistant or entrenched boards
These strategies are not mutually exclusive. Many ESG funds combine multiple approaches. For example, integrating ESG scores into a best-in-class selection framework while also engaging in proxy voting.
For investors, understanding which strategy a fund employs is essential to assessing its alignment with both ethical priorities and investment goals.
Evaluating ESG Funds: How is ESG Measured?
Not all ESG funds are created equal. Labels such as “sustainable,” “green,” or “responsible” can mask wide differences in methodology, holdings, and actual impact.
To make informed decisions, investors must go beyond marketing material and evaluate ESG funds based on their stated strategy, structure, and transparency.
Fund Mandate and Strategy Alignment
Begin by identifying what ESG strategy the fund actually follows. Is it focused on:
- Negative screening (exclusion)?
- ESG integration?
- Thematic exposure (e.g., clean energy)?
- Impact generation?
Check the fund’s prospectus or factsheet for clarity on its ESG objectives, targeted sectors or exclusions, and alignment with a specific sustainability theme.
If the strategy is unclear or overly broad (e.g., “we consider ESG factors where applicable”), it may be a sign of weak integration or tokenism.
ESG Ratings and Third-Party ESG Investing Metrics
Most ESG funds receive ratings from independent providers such as:
- MSCI ESG Ratings
- Sustainalytics (Morningstar)
- ISS ESG
- Refinitiv or S&P Global ESG
These agencies score companies and funds based on ESG-related risks and disclosures. However, methodologies vary widely. One provider may rate a company “high risk,” while another considers it “average”.
Personal financial planners may also have their own metrics that they can recommend to clients.
Scores are also relative to industry peers, not absolute ESG performance. Many ratings emphasize policy disclosure over real-world outcomes.
Use ESG scores as a starting point, not a final verdict. Ideally, the fund manager should disclose which ratings system they follow and how ESG scores influence portfolio construction.
Fund Holdings and Exposure
Review the fund’s top holdings to ensure they align with its stated ESG mandate. For example:
- A “low carbon” fund should not have fossil fuel producers in its top 10.
- A “gender equity” ETF should not include companies with poor diversity records.
Also examine:
- Sector allocation: ESG funds often overweight tech and underweight energy or materials.
- Geographic exposure: Funds may favor developed markets where ESG data is more reliable.
If the fund’s holdings don’t match its stated values, it may be engaging in greenwashing—marketing ESG without meaningful differentiation.
Fees and Performance
ESG funds often carry higher fees due to the cost of research, screening, and active management. Compare the fund’s:
- Expense ratio
- Tracking error (if it’s an index fund)
- Net returns over 1-, 3-, and 5-year periods
Assess whether the fund’s returns are:
- Consistent with its benchmark
- Justified by its strategy (e.g., lower volatility, improved downside protection)
- Diluted by high management fees
Passive ESG ETFs may offer lower-cost exposure, while actively managed funds may justify higher fees with more refined analysis and shareholder engagement.
Transparency and Reporting
High-quality ESG funds provide regular, detailed reporting that goes beyond performance charts. Look for:
- ESG impact reports (carbon footprint, diversity metrics, sustainability targets)
- Proxy voting records
- Company engagement summaries
- Alignment with global reporting frameworks (e.g., TCFD, SFDR, GRI)
If a fund makes bold ESG claims but does not publish supporting documentation or engage in shareholder activity, its credibility should be questioned.
Risk and Diversification
Evaluate the fund’s risk profile in the context of your broader portfolio:
- Sector concentration: Many ESG funds are tech-heavy, creating overlap and correlation risk.
- Volatility: Thematic funds focused on green tech or innovation may be more volatile.
- Liquidity: ESG impact or private equity funds may have long lock-up periods.
Also consider macro risks. For example, a global ESG fund may be exposed to emerging markets with less consistent ESG reporting or weaker regulatory enforcement.
Evaluating ESG funds requires a mix of qualitative review (mandates, transparency, philosophy) and quantitative analysis (holdings, fees, performance).
Investors should not assume that an ESG label guarantees alignment with their values or financial objectives.
Instead, careful fund selection should focus on strategy consistency, operational transparency, and evidence of active stewardship.
Pained by financial indecision?
Become my client
Take client eligibility quiz
Contact
Adam is an internationally recognised author on financial matters with over 830million answer views on Quora, a widely sold book on Amazon, and a contributor on Forbes.